Date of Award
2020
Embargo Period
8-1-2024
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Health Administration
College
College of Health Professions
First Advisor
Jillian B. Harvey
Second Advisor
Kit N. Simpson
Third Advisor
Lynn Carpenter
Abstract
The problem that we face as a nation is the increasing cases of opiate overdoses (CDC, 2019). Regulations vary across state lines regarding patient needs and prescribing regulations. The current study addresses closing the gaps in opioid use disorder. The overarching research question for this study is—How are Narcan policies related to the drug’s utilization? Other questions in this study will be explored through analysis of national claims data. The study population consist of beneficiaries who have received a prescription for Narcan in 2016. The data includes Narcan prescriptions across state lines as well as the Narcan access law. Using the MarketScan Commercial Database we look at patient claims from states that do not have a Narcan access law and states with a Narcan access law. The study included a total of 3,756,833 prescriptions for naloxone and opioids (14,210, 0.38%), naloxone only (1660, 0.04%), and opioids only (3,740,963, 99.6%) provided to privately insured individuals in 2016. In total, 7448 Naloxone prescriptions by State Policy Status were dispensed in 2016. The odds of receiving a Naloxone prescription in access law states presented 40% greater than the states without the access law in 2016. This study will add to the literature concerning the misuse of prescription and illicit opioids.
Recommended Citation
Kramer, Julie, "Examining the Differences in Narcan Prescription Across States" (2020). MUSC Theses and Dissertations. 574.
https://medica-musc.researchcommons.org/theses/574
Rights
All rights reserved. Copyright is held by the author.