Date of Award

2018

Embargo Period

1-1-2018

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Health & Rehabilitation Science

College

College of Health Professions

Abstract

This study utilizes electronic health record data from the Medical University of South Carolina’s intensive care units as the basis for this Monte Carlo simulation study— which compares four methods for handling missing SOFA scores, both at the composite and component levels. The four methods examined herein include: complete case analysis, median imputation, zero imputation (the method recommended by the creators of the SOFA score), and multiple imputation. This study found that zero imputation introduced the most bias across all three outcomes studied, and therefore is not recommended. Complete case analysis, or ignoring missing data, caused varying amounts of bias—as did median imputation. Multiple imputation, on the other hand, performed well for all three outcomes studied, both at the composite and component levels, demonstrating this method’s superior value in the presence of missing SOFA scores.

Rights

All rights reserved. Copyright is held by the author.

Share

COinS