Document Type

Presentation

Publication Date

Spring 4-13-2025

Faculty Mentor

Zesarae Bodie

Abstract

Animal-Assisted Therapy (AAT) provides meaningful benefits in rehabilitation, including reduced anxiety and improved motivation and physical outcomes (Burres et al, 2016, Denzer-Weiler & Hreha, 2018). However, barriers such as inconsistent scheduling and limited clinician experience hinder implementation in fast-paced healthcare settings. This project took place at a large inpatient acute care hospital where therapy staff sought to integrate AAT more effectively into rehabilitation sessions.

The purpose of this quality improvement project was to develop a sustainable scheduling method to facilitate coordination between therapy staff and volunteer animal-handler teams. Goals included improving interdisciplinary communication, enhancing patient engagement through AAT, and creating accessible tools for consistent implementation.

Over a four-week period, AAT sessions occurred on nine days, involving 12 therapists, 6 animal-handler teams, and 15 patients. A shared scheduling document was created and refined based on real-time feedback. Post-implementation surveys showed that 100% of clinicians rated the system as “very convenient,” and all volunteers found communication “very effective.” Qualitative feedback indicated AAT increased patient participation, motivation, and morale.

Deliverables included a digital scheduling tool, educational materials for staff and volunteers, and an updated therapy animal role description. This project supports AAT integration in acute rehab settings by addressing logistical barriers and promoting interdisciplinary collaboration.

References

Burres, S., Edwards, N. E., Beck, A. M., & Richards, E. (2016). Incorporating pets into acute inpatient rehabilitation: A case study. Rehabilitation Nursing, 41(6), 336-341. 10.1002/rnj.260

Denzer-Weiler, C., & Hreha, K. (2018). The use of animal-assisted therapy in combination with physical therapy in an inpatient rehabilitation facility: A case report. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 32, 139-144. 10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.06.007

Share

COinS